"The only captives are they who want to
remain captives "
on reading this sentence, we understand that
we don't remain by chance in the capture. And
if it arrives that we are captured accidentally, the fact to remain in this
situation comes back to us. We remain captives only by will. Is the point of
view of the author is true?
The author confounds between what exists and
what he hopes. The author praises the free will, and on the other hand he hates
the domination and the alienation so much so that he recognises only one shape
of capture, it is the capture by will. I don't believe that himself believes that his attitude is believable. It
seems that the author took this position solely to encourage every individual
to rescue his liberty and to destroy his cage.
If we take the poverty, the ignorance and
the illness as hindrances then we ask why there are people who live these conditions silently? Why
don't they destroy their cages if it is in their possibility to pass these
conditions and if" The only captives are they who want to remain
captives "?
Indeed if they remain it these conditions it
that is because they could not pass their miserable conditions. No one wants to
be captive of poverty or illness.